Defendant

A Imprisonment for 6 months, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won.

Defendant

D does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A leased one story of the underground floor of the building in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and installed five rooms, CCTV, etc., and employed female employees F (V, age 24) and operated similar commercial sex acts business establishments with the trade name of "G". Defendant B performed commercial sex acts with A as the head of the above business establishments.

From September 27, 2012 to October 29, 2012, the Defendants received 35,000 won per 15 minutes from the unspecified male descendants who had reported and contacted advertisements on the Internet sex trafficking brokerage site, and had F et al. do the act of similarity by allowing F et al. to see the sexual organ of the said male in his/her hand and her hand, and to see it.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on business day, on-site photographs, and photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor: Selection of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. Probation and community service order (defendant A) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B);

1. Sentencing Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendant A does not repeat that there was a record of being sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for the same kind of crime on September 2012.

2. Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the same kind of crime on November 11, 2009 and two years of suspended execution. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that the degree of participation in the instant crime was insignificant and more than the degree of participation.