Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor of 8 months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving C124cc.

On May 25, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 04:00, the blood alcohol concentration of 0.094%, proceeded at an insular speed along the parallel of the Pyeongtaekn-dong in Daegu, Seogu, Seo-gu along the one-lane distance from the boundary of the north illegal north to the New Linnen-distance.

Since there is a four-distance intersection with signal apparatus, the person engaged in the driving duty has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the signal with a view to keeping the front door well and safely.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in entering the above intersection in violation of the vehicle stop signal and did not avoid a D-ro cab operated by the victim B(54 years old) who passed the above intersection from the direction of the opposite side of the distance to the large zone, and did not shock the front part of the victim taxi on the right side of the Defendant Ortoba.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, approximately 16 weeks from the victim E (year 21) who was on the back seat of Defendant Otoba, approximately 16 weeks of the right frame, etc., and the victim F (year 21) with approximately 8 weeks of the body frame, etc. in need of treatment, and approximately 2 weeks of the body frame, etc. of the body part of the body part requiring treatment to the victim F (year 21).

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving of a D-ro taxi.

The Defendant proceeded at a speed of about 77 km from the direction of the opposite side of the modern ginseng at the same time and place as that of the preceding paragraph, along three lanes.

Since there is a four-distance intersection with signal apparatus, the person engaged in the driving duty has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the signal with a view to keeping the front door well and safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant is guilty.