The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 28, 2016, the Defendant, at Jeju City around 01:00, respondeded to the victim E (37 tax) to the effect that “the victim would not take any other place,” and the victim respondeded to the purport that “the victim would have no other place.” The Defendant: (a) assaulted the victim’s breath with kne, and knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, and assault the victim when he was feld with the victim’s left kne buck.

2. The above facts charged are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim may recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant in the process of examining the witness of the court on October 18, 2017, which was after the institution of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.