A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 20:00 on December 9, 2014, the Defendant, who interfered with his/her duties, took a bath by drinking alcohol to the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Seopopopo City, with the “E” restaurant, and taking his/her employees, such as “this ringer, spores,” and hacking customers, and talking to the customers, such as “mathing softened softens,” and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 30 minutes.

2. On December 9, 2014, at the place indicated in Paragraph 1, at around 21:15, the Defendant: (a) Daced him to the G region located in the Seogpopo Police Station F District for the 112 Report for the said reasons; (b) Dacing him to see, “this dog, the police sees, why she would do so, why she would do so; and (c) the said G may be punished as a crime of insult against the Defendant; (d) Gacing him/herself to frogate, and flabing him/her into the flab of H’s flabbbage, and obstructing the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of a police official’s 112 report case, by scaming the flab of H, belonging to the same flab.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D, H and G

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Mutual Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act: A sentence the same as the order shall be imposed in consideration of the above circumstances, such as the fact that an agreement is made with the victim of the obstruction of business, the fact that each 300,000 won was deposited for the victimized police officers, and the fact that there is a lot of obstruction of business and violence criminal records, etc.