2015 Doz. 50271 Compensation (as referred to in this paragraph)

1. A;

2. B

3

Since it is a minor, the legal representative B and A

4. D;

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

Since it is a minor, the legal representative mother F

8. H;

A person shall be appointed.

10. J

11. K;

1. L;

2. M;

3. Jeonnam-do.

The representative of the Do Governor's Do Governor

4. Fence group:

The representative of the Gun most form;

March 3, 2016

April 7, 2016

1. Defendant L, Defendant M, and Jeonnam-do shared with Plaintiff A, 192, 435, 404, and 10,00,00,00 won to Plaintiff B, and 5,00,000 won to Plaintiff C, respectively, and KRW 168,417,267, and KRW 284,906,953, and KRW 178,271,302, and KRW 261,828,816, and KRW 10,00,000, KRW 159,137,473, and each of the above amounts to Plaintiff C with 15,00 per annum from the following day to the 15th day of January 16, 2014.

2. The plaintiffs' remaining claims against the defendant L, defendant M, and defendant Jeon Nam-do and each claims against the defendant Taeyang-do are dismissed.

3. Of the costs of lawsuit, 1/20 of the portion arising between the plaintiffs and the defendant L, the defendant M, and the defendant Jeonnam-do is the plaintiffs, and the remainder is the defendants, and the part arising between the plaintiffs and the defendant Taeyang-gun is the plaintiffs, respectively.

4. Paragraph 1 can be provisionally executed.

The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A, KRW 217, 688, 045, and KRW 15,00,000, and Plaintiff C

5,00,000 won, Plaintiff D, and Plaintiff E, respectively, KRW 177, 417, 200, Plaintiff F, KRW 295, 106, 925, Plaintiff

G 210,071, 283 won, Plaintiff H 299, 828, 700 won, Plaintiff I 50,000, 000 won, Plaintiff J, and won

from November 15, 2014, the complaint in this case in respect of 168, 137, 406 won and each of the above amounts to K

Until the service date of a duplicate, 5% per annum and 15% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment.

United States of America shall pay the sum of money.

1. Basic facts

(a) The installation of Defendant L and M’s pension operations and burgies;

Defendant L and M have taken over and operated the second floor building and the second floor 00 pentle (hereinafter referred to as “the instant pentle”) with four dongs in the Dunyang-gun of Jeonyang-gun, Jeonyang-gun on April 2005.

In around 206, the Defendants planned to construct a new building for the purpose of burcing the burcule that can be consumed by crypting the burcule. Accordingly, in 2007, the Defendants constructed a pipe pole on the pentine burcule burcule, made the outer wall on the roof, installed the outer wall with a wooden board, covered the burcule-materials material burcule on the roof, covered by the vinyl, covered by the vinyl, covered by the burcule-materials material burcule on the upper part of the inner burcule, and covered by the upper part of the floor and the wall of the entire burcule with a plastic board, and newly constructed the burcule (hereinafter “the instant burcule-cule-cule”). The Defendants installed the instant burcule from 4 burcule to burc.

In this case, only one entrance was installed at the end of the left side of the building, but no other entrance was installed.

B. The occurrence of a fire is high, Kim 00, 00, 00, 00, 100, 100 are students or graduates of 00 universities or graduates located in Naju City. The members of the Rusgle who belong to them are members of the Rusgle 2014.

11. 15. 15. Bago trading was made in the Hagyang-gun in the Hagyang-gun, and approximately 26 members of the 18:30th day were gathered in the instant Bagyang-gun.

At around 21:40 of the same day when the above members were drinking in the instant burgical area, the members of the instant burgical area, which were installed in the instant burgical area, she took water into the burgic area on the said burg as he thought that she could reduce the furgic power, and then moved to the burg as he was faced with the said burging in the said burg, so that he was forced to make the said burg by making the said furgy more stronging in the said burgical area. The burg was moved to the entire burg in the instant burg during the period of the burging period, and accordingly, the burged in the instant burgic area (hereinafter referred to as “the instant fire accident”).

The fire accident of this case led to the death of 100, 00, 100, 100, 100 in the place of the instant burgical area, which was caused by the instant burgical area. The Kim 00 died by the furgic shock by the furgic image on November 23, 2014 while being receiving treatment by suffering three degrees of images from the telegraph.

C. The relationship between the plaintiffs and the deceased

The relationship between the plaintiffs and the network height0, 00, 100, 100, 100, and 100 is as follows:

2. The occurrence of liability for damages

A. Defendant L or M’s damage liability

The following circumstances revealed from the overall purport of Gap evidence 3, 7, 9-1, 3, 4, 7, 8, and 10-1, 3, 4, 7, 8, and 10-1, i.e., the investigation agency of this case stated that the △△△△△ was first fire extinguishing at the investigation agency of this case.

A. Since then, this statement was made by Defendant L L’s son’s request and re-satisfy, which re-satisfyed that there was no fire extinguishing, ② the survivors who were absent from the batur area of this case did not keep fire extinguishing in the batur area of this case; ③ Defendant Mannam-do stated that fire extinguishing was kept in the batur area of this case in light of the fact that there was a fire extinguishing machine in each image of evidence No. 4, a photographic picture of the batur area after the fire accident of this case. However, in light of the above statements and the above statements made by the investigative agency that the aforementioned survivors tried to bring the fire extinguishing machine in the batur area of this case after the fire accident of this case, it can be acknowledged that the fire extinguishing machine in this case was not kept in the batur area of this case.

According to the above facts and basic facts, Defendant L and M allow customers to use the instant bridge as the operator of the instant bridge. Since the instant bridge is a building using fire by many users, there is a danger of fire, in constructing the instant bridge, it shall use heat resistance and fire resistant substance that can withstanding fire in the construction of the instant bridge, and ② it shall be equipped with fire extinguishing equipment such as fire extinguishing equipment in the instant bridge; ③ it shall be secured a shelter way so that users can promptly evacuate in the event of fire; ④ in the case of the instant brine, it may be demoted due to the state, quantity, or contact with water, and thus, the precautions in the event of the use of brine shall be given to the users, notwithstanding the duty of care to properly inform the users of the brine, the Plaintiffs did not install the instant brine with fire extinguishing equipment such as wood, combined and plastic equipment, and ③ it shall not be installed in the instant brine, and the Plaintiffs did not install the instant brine with fire extinguishing equipment due to the left.

B. Liability for damages of Defendant Jeonnam-do

The Act on the Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems (hereinafter “Fire-Fighting Systems Act”) aims to contribute to the installation and maintenance of fire-fighting systems, etc. and the promotion of public safety and welfare by prescribing necessary matters concerning the safety management of fire-fighting systems, etc. in order to protect the lives, bodies, and property of the people from fire, disaster, disaster, and other emergency situations, and thus, the provisions of the snow-Fighting Systems Act are not merely for the public interest but also for the protection of the safety and interests of the members of society entirely or incidentally. Thus, if a public official of a local government fails to perform his/her duties, if it is recognized that he/she lost objective legitimacy when he/she is a public official of the general public who is faithfully in performing his/her duties, he/she meets the requirements of illegality under Article 2 of

It is reasonable to see that it is.

Considering the above basic facts, Gap evidence Nos. 6 through 11, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 and video images, witness testimony of the △△△△△△△△△, the result of this court’s verification, and the overall purport of the arguments, the fire officers of the Duranam-do have the duty to investigate all the penta and check the penta in this case including the instant pentaeba in conducting a special fire safety inspection by visiting the pentae in order to conduct a special fire safety inspection, and to confirm whether there is a risk of fire and to take appropriate measures accordingly, despite the duty to take appropriate measures, there is a violation of official duty not to examine the penta in this case’s pentaebaba, which is in conformity with the duty, and thus loses objective legitimacy when considering the standards of ordinary public officials faithful to the duty.

1) According to Article 4 (1) of the Fire-Fighting Systems Act, the chief of a fire station may authorize relevant public officials to conduct a special investigation on fire safety control (hereinafter referred to as "special fire safety inspection") in order to ascertain whether the fire-fighting facilities, etc. are installed, maintained, or managed in compliance with this Act or fire-fighting-related Acts and subordinate statutes, or whether there is a risk of fire, disaster, or disaster, etc. to the fire-fighting objects. According to Article 5 of the Fire-Fighting Systems Act, the location, structure, equipment, or management of the fire-fighting object need to be supplemented for the prevention of fire, disaster, or accident, or if a fire is anticipated to cause damage to human life or property, he/she may order the improvement, relocation, removal, prohibition or closure of the fire-fighting object, suspension or discontinuance of the use, construction, or other necessary measures of the fire-fighting officer's pent at least in 207, and he/she visited the fire-fighting officer's pent at least in 2012.7.26.7.

3) The instant BBC is a wooden plate, and the outer wall is covered by vinyl, and the roof is covered by the upper tent, and the inner tent is attached with vinyl plates as a whole and part of the inner tent. Therefore, it seems that the above fire-fighting officer, who is a fire-fighting specialist, was vulnerable to fire even if the external appearance of the fire-fighting officer, could have known that the fire-fighting officer was vulnerable to fire. Nevertheless, the above fire-fighting officer did not examine whether the instant BBC is installed, maintained, and managed in compliance with the fire-fighting-related statutes and regulations, and whether there is a risk of fire.

In addition, according to Gap evidence No. 10 and Gap evidence No. 11's overall purport of the video and oral argument, it is recognized that the total floor area of the plaintiff 10 is 57 square meters, and according to Articles 9 and 15 of the Fire-Fighting Facilities Act and the attached Table 5 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, fire-fighting facilities to be installed in the plaintiff 10 are fire extinguishers. Therefore, if fire-fighting officers did not violate their official duties, the fire-fighting officers would have taken measures to have fire-fighting equipments kept in the plaintiff 10. In light of the above basic facts, if the fire-fighting equipment was kept in the plaintiff 10, it would have been likely to delay to extinguish or remove fire at least at least at least at the beginning in the fire accident occurred in the plaintiff 10, and there is a proximate causal relation between the violation of official duties and the deceased's death as the fire accident in this case.

Therefore, Defendant Jeonnam-do jointly with Defendant L and M is liable for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant fire accident.

C. Whether to compensate for the damage of the Defendant Fashyang Group

1) The plaintiffs' assertion

Defendant Duyang-gun is in a position to take appropriate measures against buildings for which permission has not been granted. Also, the duty to prevent fire through regular and occasional inspections. Nevertheless, the public officials in charge of Defendant Duyang-gun office did not comply with various fire-related laws and regulations, and in particular, the instant BBC did not obtain permission from the competent authorities and did not conduct a field investigation despite the fact that there is a significant risk of fire.

The letter of this case is illegally occupied and constructed on the state property under the management of the defendant Boyang-gun, and the public official in charge of the defendant Boyang-gun has a duty to remove the letter of this case without fault, despite the duty to remove it.

In addition, the public officials in charge of the Defendant Fash Group inspected the instant pention over several occasions from March 2012 to March 2013, 2013. In particular, on March 14, 2012, the Defendant Fash Group was negligent in failing to take appropriate corrective measures against the instant pention even though it was found that the instant pention was insufficient to keep and manage the fire extinguisher while inspecting the instant pention.

2) Determination:

According to the statement in Eul evidence No. 4, the check of the instant pention was conducted several times from March 2012 to March 2013 by the public officials belonging to the defendant Duyang-gun for the purpose of evaluating the level of sanitary management based on Article 13 of the Public Health Control Act, and it is possible to issue an improvement order for any violation of the matters to be observed under the Public Health Control Act. However, if the matters to be observed are not the matters to be observed under the Public Health Control Act, such as the keeping of a fire extinguisher, but the recommended matters are insufficient, there is no authority to issue an order to improve them. Therefore, it is difficult to deem that the above public officials violate their duties on account of failure to take any measure in relation

According to the Building Act and the State Property Management Act, Defendant Boyang-gun has the authority to regulate the building that was not permitted as in this case, and the head of this case has the authority to regulate the illegal possession of state-owned property. Moreover, the fact that Defendant Boyang-gun did not regulate the head of this case Boyang-gun does not conflict between the parties concerned. However, the fire accident in this case was caused by the fire that the head of this case was the vulnerable material to the fire, fire extinguishing equipment such as fire extinguishing equipments, etc., and that the fire extinguishing equipment such as fire extinguishing equipment was not secured, and that it was caused by the negligence that did not inform the deceased, etc. of the precautions regarding the use of the Babane, and that the failure to obtain permission or illegal possession of state-owned property directly affected the death of the deceased. Accordingly, even if the violation of official duty, such as the Plaintiff’s assertion regarding the illegal possession of state-owned property, it is difficult to view that there was proximate causal relation between the death of the deceased and the breach of official duty.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' assertion against the defendant Jinyang-gun is without merit.

D. Limitation on the liability of Defendant L, M, or Jeonnam-do

However, in light of the circumstances leading up to the occurrence of the instant fire accident, the Defendants’ above Defendants’ liability should be limited to 90%. Accordingly, the Defendants’ liability should be limited to 90%.

The Defendant L/M asserts that the instant fire accident was caused by the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the Plaintiff, etc., on the ground that any of the members of the Dongi-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si, who was imprising the fire more strongly in the erosion, and that it should be taken into account by the victim’s negligence as it was transferred to the erode, which was caused by the erosion that was imprising down in the erosion. However, as seen earlier, the instant fire accident was not equipped with fire extinguishing equipment such as fire, and it was not secured by evacuation, and it was caused by the negligence that did not inform the Deceased et al. of the precautions on the use of the erode.g., this case’s fire accident, despite the circumstances leading up to the occurrence of the fire accident, it is difficult to view that the Defendants’ above Defendants’ assertion is reasonable.

3. Scope of the liability for damages of the defendant L, M, ornam-do.

In addition to the following separate statements, each corresponding column of the relevant statement of calculation of damages in attached Form ( omitted) shall be the same as the statement in the corresponding column of the relevant statement of calculation of damages (in accordance with the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare that deducts the interim interest at a rate of 5/12 percent per month as a single interest, and in accordance with the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare that deducts the interim interest at a rate of 5/12 percent per month, monthly below the convenience of calculation, and

(a) Personal information on the net high 00 1) the net income;

As shown in the column of "basic matters" of the attached Table 100 damages calculation sheet.

(B) occupation, income and operation period;

The deceased High 00 was enrolled in the first grade of the nursing department at 00 universities at the time of the instant fire accident, and thus, the deceased High 00 can graduate from the above university and acquire a nurse's license and engage in the occupation unless there were special circumstances if the instant fire accident had occurred (see Supreme Court Decision 88Meu15970, May 23, 1989, etc.).

Since the average retirement age of general nurses is 57.6 years of age, it is 2018 that the net height0 graduated from the above university.

3.1. From January to December 31, 2053, the last day of the year in which he is 57 years of age, the nurse shall be deemed to have been capable of being operated as an urban daily worker until December 31, 2053, and from then to the next 60 years of age.

The average annual salary of a nurse who graduated from a four-year university is KRW 28,960,00. As such, for the period during which the net high 00 would have been able to be operated as a nurse, 2,413,33 won per month ( = 28,960,00 won: 12 months) and for the period during which the net high 00 would have been able to be operated as an urban worker, the amount of income equivalent to the daily wage of the ordinary worker shall be deemed to have been able to have been able to have been able to obtain the income for the period during which the net 00 would have been able to be operated as a daily worker. One-third of the daily income shall be deducted from the living cost.

Although Plaintiff A, B, and C also claimed damages equivalent to the amount of the lost retirement allowance of the deceased high 00, the fact that the deceased high 00 was recognized as the daily income of the deceased high 00 even if there was no certain amount of income as a student of the University Nursing at the time of the instant fire accident is merely an evaluation of the labor ability to obtain a nurse license after obtaining a nurse license and obtaining a nurse license. Accordingly, it is not reasonable to include the amount equivalent to the retirement allowance in calculating the lost income of 00, which is likely to be employed as a nurse, as such, in calculating the lost income of 00, the amount equivalent to the retirement allowance. Accordingly, this part of the Plaintiffs’ assertion is without merit.

2) Limitation of liability: 10% (see above 2-D. 3) mutual aid

The consolation money paid by Defendant L or M shall be deducted from KRW 8,00,000. 4)

In consideration of all all the circumstances, such as the age, family relationship, accident circumstance, etc. of the net height00, inheritance relationship between the Plaintiff B, which appears to be the actual two parts of the net height00, such as filing an application for full adoption against the Plaintiff A, who is the mother of the net height00, with respect to the Plaintiff A, who is the mother of the net height0, 15,000,000,000, and the net height00, in fact, shall be recognized as 10,000,000, and 5,000,000,000, for other Dongs who are the father of the network,

The mother of the deceased 00 shall be the heir of the plaintiff A and the birth father, and the share of the plaintiff A shall be 1/2.

【Ground of recognition】 The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence 1, and the amount acknowledged by plaintiff 6).

The calculation is identical to the attached Form No. 192, 435, 404 won for Plaintiff A ( = inheritance amount of KRW 177, 435, 404 + KRW 15,000 + KRW 10,000), for Plaintiff B, KRW 10,00,00 for Plaintiff B ( = 10,000 consolation money, KRW 10,000), and KRW 5,000,00 for Plaintiff C ( = KRW 5,000 for consolation money, KRW 00, KRW 00).

(b) Personal data of net Kim00 1)

As shown in the column of "basic matters" in the attached Table 1 Kim 00 damages calculation sheet.

(B) occupation, income and operation period;

The deceased Kim00 appears to have been residing in an urban area at the time of the instant fire accident, and it would have been able to obtain income equivalent to the daily wage of ordinary workers while engaging in daily work of large volume city until the 22th day of the month when he reaches the age of 60, and it would have been able to obtain income from the daily wage, and one-third of the daily income shall be deducted from the living expenses.

2) Medical expenses

The medical expenses that the deceased Kim00 incurred from the instant fire accident to November 23, 2014 were 22,122,520 won.

3) Limitation of liability: 10% (see above 2-D. 4) mutual aid

The consolation money paid by Defendant L or M shall be deducted from KRW 8,00,000. 5)

In consideration of all all the circumstances, such as the age, family relationship, accident circumstance, etc. of the deceased Kim 00, 30,000, 000, and 20,000 won are recognized as to Plaintiff D and E, who are parents of the deceased Kim 00, respectively.

5) Inheritance relations

The plaintiff D and E, who is the parent of the deceased Kim00, shall be the heir, and their shares are 1/2 each.

【Unsatisfy-based dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 13, and the purport of the whole pleadings】 Amounts recognized by each plaintiff

The calculation is the same as the separate sheet of the amount of damages calculated on the basis of the attached Table 168, 417, 267 won for plaintiffs D and E ( = inheritance amount of KRW 148, 417, 267 + 20,000,000) shall be recognized.

(c) Personal information on net 00 1) lost imports;

Attached Form 00 "Basic Matters in the Table for Calculation of Damages for Damages" shall be as shown in the column of "Basic Matters."

(B) occupation, income and operation period;

The net Chapter 00, while serving in the 00-guns 00 association at the time of the instant fire accident, had earned income of KRW 4,215,047 per month, and until the date on which he reaches the age of 60, it is deemed that he could have earned income equivalent to the above amount, and one-third of the lost income shall be deducted from the living expenses.

Plaintiff F and G sought damages of KRW 10,00,000 as part of a claim with the lost Chapter 00 retirement allowance. However, there is no evidence to support the fact that the deceased Chapter 00 was unable to receive retirement allowances due to the instant fire accident, the above Plaintiffs’ assertion on this part is without merit. 2) 10% (see the above 2-D. 3) deduction

The consolation money paid by Defendant L or M shall be deducted from KRW 8,00,000. 4)

Taking into account all all the circumstances, such as the age, family relationship, accident circumstance, etc. of the net Chapter 00, KRW 30,000 against the net Chapter 00, KRW 25,000 against the Plaintiff F, who is the spouse of the net Chapter 00, KRW 25,000, and KRW 00 against the network Chapter 00, and Plaintiff G, who is a father of the network Chapter 00, sought payment of KRW 5,000 as part of the claim. In light of the above circumstances, Plaintiff G, who is a father of the network Chapter 00, sought payment of KRW 5,00,000 against Plaintiff G.

The plaintiff F and the plaintiff G, who is his spouse of the net 00, shall be the heir, and the share of inheritance shall be 3/5 and 2/5.

[Judgment of the court below] The amount of each plaintiff's assertion 3 and 14, and the amount of each plaintiff's assertion 6] without dispute

The calculation is identical to the attached sheet of the amount of damages calculated on the basis of attached Table 00, and therefore, it is recognized as to Plaintiff F ( = inheritance amount of KRW 259,906,953 + KRW 259,00,000 + KRW 25,000 + KRW 178,271,302 for Plaintiff G ( = inheritance amount of KRW 173,271,302 + KRW 5,000,00).

(d) Personal information on the net transport 00 1) the net import price;

As shown in the column of "basic matters" of the attached Table 100 damages calculation sheet.

(B) occupation, income and operation period;

The net Song 00 appears to have been residing in an urban area at the time of the instant fire accident, and it would have been able to obtain income equivalent to the daily wage of ordinary workers while engaging in daily work in the quantity of daily work on the 22th day of the month in which he/she reaches the age of 60, and one-third of the daily income shall be deducted from the cost of living.

2) Limitation of liability: 10% (see above 2-D. 3) mutual aid

The consolation money paid by Defendant L or M shall be deducted from KRW 8,00,000. 4)

Inheritance relationship between Plaintiff I, the spouse of the de facto marital relationship of the deceased 00, taking into account all all the circumstances, such as the age, family relationship, background of the accident, etc. of the deceased 30,000,000, 20,000, 000, and 10,000,000 won, as to Plaintiff I, the spouse of the de facto marital relationship of the deceased 00

Plaintiff H, the father of the deceased 00, succeeds to all.

[Judgment of the court below] The non-contentious facts, Gap's evidence No. 4, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the amount admitted by plaintiff

The calculation is identical to the attached Form No. 261, 828,816 won for Plaintiff H ( = inheritance amount of KRW 241,828,816 + consolation money of KRW 20,00,000), and KRW 10,00,000 for Plaintiff 1 ( = consolation money of KRW 10,000,000,000).

(e) Personal information on net 00 1) lost earnings;

As shown in the column of "basic matters" of the attached Table 100 damages calculation sheet.

(B) occupation, income and operation period;

The net 00 appears to have been residing in an urban area at the time of the instant fire accident, and it is deemed that the daily wage of ordinary workers would have been earned as a result of engaging in daily work at the 22th day of each month until the date on which he reaches the age of 60, while engaging in daily work at the age of 60, and that the daily income would have been deducted from the living expenses.

2) Limitation of liability: 10% (see above 2-D. 3) mutual aid

The consolation money paid by Defendant L or M shall be deducted from KRW 8,00,000. 4)

Inheritance relationship between Plaintiff J, who is a parent of the net 00, and K, with respect to 20,00,000 won for the net 00, taking into account all all the circumstances, such as age, family relationship, accident circumstance, etc. of the net 00, and the relationship of inheritance 5, which recognized 00 won for K, respectively.

The plaintiff J and K, who is the parent of the net 00, shall become the heir, and their shares of inheritance shall be 1/2 each.

[Judgment of the court below] The non-contentious facts, Gap's evidence No. 5, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the amount admitted by plaintiff

The calculation is identical to the attached Form No. 159, 137, 473 won for Plaintiff J and K respectively ( = inheritance amount of KRW 139, 137, 473 + 20,000,000).

F. Sub-decision

Therefore, Defendant L, M, and Jeonnam-do are jointly liable to pay to the Plaintiffs the amount as indicated below, and to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum prescribed by the Civil Act from November 15, 2014 when the fire accident of this case occurred until April 7, 2016, which is the sentencing date of this case, until April 7, 2016, and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day until the day of full payment.

4. Conclusion

Therefore, each claim against Defendant L, M, and Jeonnam-do by the plaintiffs is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. Each claim against the plaintiffs to Defendant Myang-gun is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge shall coordinate judges;

Judges Song-chul

Judges' rights and leathers