The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the following: (a) the summary of the grounds for appeal: (b) the Defendant confessions and reflects the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant took drinking habits as a means to resolve the influence; and (d) the Defendant was unable to purchase a mandatory insurance policy against the instant Obane due to economic difficulties as a basic livelihood recipient; and (b) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for an excessive period of time.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the crimes of this case is to be strictly punished, taking into account the following factors: (a) even though the Defendant had already been subject to driving under the influence of alcohol at least two times, the driving of 0.163% of blood alcohol without a license; (b) the Defendant continued driving without a license even though there is no time the Defendant acquired a license for a motorcycle; (c) driving without a license; (d) the driving without a license is likely to cause damage to individuals as well as other unspecified lives and property; and (e) the Defendant has been subject to punishment by taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant has been sentenced to punishment several times for a same and similar crime, such as a violation of the Road Traffic Act or a violation of the Road Traffic Act (i.e., imprisonment with labor at least ten times, fines at least three times); and (b) the Defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at least three times on January 11, 2013; and (b) the Defendant again committed an act of violating the Road Traffic Act, etc.