The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant was under the status of those who did not attend his mother's family, and was under the influence of drinking while driving a drinking, and that the defendant was under the control of about 70,00 won agricultural debts, and the defendant was suffering from the Gap upper-board technical training certificate, and the wife and three children are in the position to support the crime of this case, and that the defendant did not repeat the crime of this case, it is unfair that the sentence (six months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime cannot be deemed to be the case that the Defendant drives a cargo vehicle without a driver's license while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.076%. The drinking driving is an offense that may cause damage not only to an individual but also to the life and property of any other person. It is necessary to strictly eradicate the instant crime by reflecting the amendment of the Road Traffic Act. In the past, the Defendant has been punished several times for the same and similar crimes (one suspended sentence of imprisonment, four times a fine), such as the violation of the Road Traffic Act or the violation of the Road Traffic Act (one-time a suspended sentence of imprisonment), and the Defendant has been punished on June 29, 201 by imprisonment with prison labor for a more than 2 months, such as the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (one-time a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor) and two-time a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a more than 20 months after obtaining a license for driving on November 23, 20111.