The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant has a favorable condition to the defendant, such as the confession of each of the crimes in this case and reflecting his mistake, and the recovery of some damage caused by the fraud.

However, even if the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine or imprisonment several times in fraud, and the execution of the sentence has been completed, the Defendant committed repeatedly the same type of fraud during the period of repeated crime, and thus, the number of fraudulent crimes, such as misrepresentation of professor of the University or false statement that he operated the art gallery, is inadequate; the amount of damage caused by the embezzlement and fraudulent crime in this case is reasonable; the victims have not been agreed upon up to the depth; there are no special circumstances to change the sentence of the lower court at the time of the trial; and there are no other circumstances to change the sentence of the lower court in light of the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, intelligence and environment; motive, background, means, method, and consequence of the crime; the circumstances before and after the crime; and the relationship with the previous offense, etc., the Defendant and his defense counsel do not accept the above unfair sentencing allegation.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.