The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below has favorable conditions such as the confession of each of the crimes of this case, the Defendant’s confessions of each of the crimes of this case, and reflects his mistake, and the Defendant’s family members are dependent. However, the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine for the same kind of crime or a suspended sentence of execution, and the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case by driving at least three months, even though not covered by mandatory insurance, causing a traffic accident, and driving at least three months without a license. The Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case. The alcohol concentration among the blood of the Defendant at the time of driving the alcohol of this case is difficult to be deemed as 0.119% lower, and was agreed with the victim or endeavored to recover from physical damage.

In full view of the following circumstances: (a) there is no circumstance to see whether the lower court’s punishment is peep; (b) there is a considerable reason for sentencing; and (c) there is no special reason to change the sentence of the lower court when the reason for sentencing is considerably reasonable and in depth; and (d) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, background, means, method, method, and consequence of the crime; and (c) the circumstances before and after the crime, and the criminal record relation, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.