1. The Defendants shall in sequence order each point of T-910 Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the attached Form 1 List as shown in the attached Table 1 List to the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

On April 17, 2012, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant store”).

The detailed shape of the store in this case is as shown in the attached Form 1 list, which connects each point of T-9110 heading 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 in sequence among the attached Form 1 list, and the part 2.87 square meters in the walth section of the ship and the part 2.87 square meters in the ship which connects each point of T-9115, 6, 7, 8, and 5 in the attached Form 2 list among the attached Form 2 list in the attached Table 1 list.

On March 30, 2012, between Defendant B and C, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the instant store as KRW 20 million (10 million for lease deposit for real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table, and KRW 10 million for lease deposit for the absence of real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table), the lease period until March 30, 2013, and KRW 2 million for monthly rent (one million for monthly rent for real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table, and one million for monthly rent for real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table), and thereafter received the lease deposit and delivered the instant store.

On March 30, 2013, the above lease agreement on the store of this case was explicitly renewed by the Do, and as Defendant B and C were in arrears, the Plaintiff sent notice of refusal to renew the lease agreement to Defendant B and C on January 2, 2014.

Defendant D, E, and F have completed business registration with respect to the instant store on October 30, 2012, with the trade name of Gweves, and operated the Sweves business at the instant store.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry and the purport of the whole pleadings of Gap 1-1, 1-2, 2, 3, 4-1, and 4-2.

According to the facts of the judgment as to the cause of the claim against the defendant B and C, the lease contract between the defendant B, C and the plaintiff was terminated by the expiration of the period of March 30, 2014, which is an implied renewed lease contract. Thus, the defendant B and C shall be restored to their original state.