logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 08. 13. 선고 2015다215175 판결
이 사건 매매계약이 사해행위에 해당하는지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Cheongju District Court-2014-B-10930 ( April 22, 2015)

Title

Whether the sales contract of this case constitutes fraudulent act

Summary

The disposition on deficits under the National Tax Collection Act is only a procedure for recognizing delinquent taxpayers as having no property to execute the disposition on default. Therefore, it is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff knew that the disposition on disposal of the real estate in this case was a fraudulent act and the intention of deception.

Cases

2018Da215175 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Plaintiff

Korea

Defendant

AAA and one other

Conclusion of Pleadings

208.13

Imposition of Judgment

208.13

Text

1. All appeals are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Accordingly, all appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per

arrow