1. The defendant's purchase price of goods at the Suwon District Court 2005 tea 4177, Sung-nam Branch Court for the plaintiff.

1. The defendant asserted that "The goods were sold in installments to the plaintiff on May 17, 1999, but failed to receive the installment payment from the plaintiff," and filed an application for a payment order with the Suwon District Court 2005Da4177, Sungnam-gu, Busan District Court for the payment of the above goods (hereinafter "the above goods payment order of this case"), and the above court is the payment order of this case on December 5, 2005.

A) The instant payment order was finalized on December 23, 2005. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds of recognition, entry in Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, it is apparent that ten years have passed since the decision of the payment order of this case became final and conclusive, and thus, the claim for the price of goods which became the cause of claim of the payment order of this case has expired after the extinctive prescription.

Therefore, it is reasonable to deny compulsory execution based on the instant payment order.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.