logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원광주시법원 2019.05.09 2018가단158
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s case concerning the purchase price of goods at the Suwon District Court, Sung-nam Branch, Gwangju City Court, 2012 tea 3211.

Reasons

1. The defendant's claim for the price of goods against the plaintiff based on the purchase contract of KIKO products concluded on March 16, 2004 between the plaintiff and the defendant for the indication of the claim and the defendant has already expired after the three-year extinctive prescription under Article 163 subparagraph 6 of the Civil Code. Thus, the defendant's claim against the plaintiff to seek the defendant's refusal of compulsory execution based on the payment order for the purchase price of goods in Sungnam-gu District Court 201, Sungnam District Court 20

2. Applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment by deemed confession (Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow