beta
Text
Defendant is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of paragraph (1) of the crime in the case of [2013 Highest 662] and the case of [2013 Highest 662].
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On June 1, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and completed the enforcement of the sentence on September 12, 2007. On February 23, 2011, the Daegu District Court sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Yongdial Support, which became final and conclusive on May 26, 2011, and completed the enforcement of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on January 29, 2012.
【Criminal Facts】
"2013 High Class 662" means that the defendant did not have any dump truck, sp truck, and other property owned by the defendant, and even if he received money from the victims for dump truck and dump truck, he did not use the money as funds to purchase dump truck and dump truck, and he planned to use the money for personal purposes, such as repayment of his obligation, and even if he received money from the victims as money for dump truck and dump truck and dump truck, c, and F, he did not have any intent or ability to transfer ownership and deliver the money for dump truck and dump truck, dump truck, and dump
Nevertheless,
1. On December 15, 2009, the Defendant received 17,000,000 won from the victim’s deposit account for a dump truck sales price for a 17,00,000 won for a dump truck sales price on the same day, with the purport that “the market price of 15 tons of 1997 dump truck is KRW 20,000,000” from the victim E.
2. On January 25, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he/she would sell dump truck to the victim C, a foreigner of Mongolian nationality, at the I office of the Defendant’s operation in Daegu-gu, and received KRW 5,00,000 on January 26, 2013 from the victim as the purchase price for dump truck, and received KRW 16,50,000 on January 30, 2013 as the Defendant’s deposit account.
3. On January 28, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the same victim at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 2, and to the same effect.