logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2021.01.12 2020노1419
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The accused of the grounds for appeal shall not inflict any bodily injury upon the victim by assaulting him/her;

The victim's statement that he/she was assaulted by the Defendant does not contain credibility, and it is difficult to secure objectivity and credibility of the diagnosis of the injury. Even if the defendant's injury is acknowledged, the victim's injury is extremely minor injury that does not interfere with natural healing and daily life without treatment, and does not amount to the degree that the completeness of the body was damaged or the physiological function was hindered. Thus, the injury of the victim does not constitute the injury of the crime of injury.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts and legal principles.

2. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, the lower court’s judgment appears to be justifiable, and there was no error of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal doctrine as alleged by the Defendant, since the Defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury upon the victim at the time.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

A. With respect to the circumstances in which the victim was submitted four days after the victim suffered the assault, the victim stated that "the defendant was at the time of his face, and the face was ice and ice, but he was punished," on October 30, 199, the victim stated that "at the time of his face, the face was taken to a sofaat hospital and the face was taken to him, and the victim was diagnosed," and on the 49,52th page of the evidence record and the court of the court of the court of the trial, "at the time of the defendant's face and she was faat on the day of the victim's assault, the victim stated that "at the time of his face and she was faated to a sofaat hospital" on October 30 thereafter, the victim's statement was sufficient.

arrow