1. The Defendant is based on the executory exemplification of the judgment rendered by the Changwon District Court on June 14, 2017.

1. According to the evidence evidence No. 1, the Defendant is recognized to have executed the attachment (hereinafter “instant compulsory execution”) on July 20, 2017, based on the executory exemplification of the judgment rendered by the Changwon District Court 2017Gaso954 (hereinafter “C”) with respect to each of the movables listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant movables”).

2. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 14 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff purchased each of the instant movable property before January 25, 2017, and kept it in the office of licensed real estate agents located in Sungwon-gu D and 106, and on January 25, 2017, agreed that "the instant movable property shall be used as the Plaintiff's property," and it is reasonable to deem that each of the instant movable property is owned by the plaintiff.

Therefore, the compulsory execution of this case under the premise that each of the movables in this case is owned by C shall not be permitted.

3. Conclusion, the claim of this case is accepted as reasonable.