A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On June 25, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating road traffic law in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on June 25, 2009, a summary order of KRW 5 million for the same crime in the same court on August 17, 2011, and a summary order of KRW 7 million for the same crime in the same court on January 23, 201, respectively.

[2] On October 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a dial vehicle at approximately 50 meters away from the front parking lot in front of the apartment commercial building in the 380-day Gayangyang-si, under the influence of alcohol content of 0.174% in light of around 14:40 on October 30, 2017, to the front road of the 3rd apartment parking lot.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking driving twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

"2018 Highest 134"

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with low bid in violation of the Road Traffic Act, the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

On March 21, 2018, the Defendant, while driving the said vehicle without obtaining a driver's license in the state of alcohol concentration of 0.154% in light of the blood alcohol level from around 21:12, and changing the three-lanes in front of the treatment apartment, which is in the middle of the net city, into the three-lanes while driving the said vehicle along the two-lane distance from the side of the women's cultural center.

At the time, there are nights and three-lanes, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to look at the person engaged in driving service well on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to change the lane as it is, and caused the damage to the right side of the driver's vehicle of the victim E(39 tax) driving by the negligence of changing the lane as it is.

Ultimately, the Defendant.