1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 28, 2009, the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (C-3) was amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274 on November 1, 2011 as a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Skistan”), the Plaintiff was deleted from the existing short-term commercial (C-2) sojourn status, and the said short-term commercial (C-2) sojourn status and the said short-term comprehensive (C-3) sojourn status were integrated into the short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status.

On December 26, 2011, when entering and staying in the Republic of Korea on two occasions, the period of stay expires, and two years and eight months after the expiration of the period of stay ( April 28, 2009), filed an application for the recognition of refugee with the Defendant on December 26, 201.

(hereinafter “instant refugee application”). B.

On November 20, 2013, the defendant rejected the refugee application of this case on the ground that the plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff would suffer persecution" as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

(See Evidence No. 1-1, hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”).

On January 2, 2014, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the instant disposition to the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed it on June 27, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1-3 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is the hydroscopic scopic arb (Lahore) met with the Rahore origin. The plaintiff's assertion is the hydroscopic scopic arb.

On March 8, 2008, the Plaintiff-friendly B (B; hereinafter referred to as “B”) murdered and escaped with the Plaintiff during the course of the Plaintiff’s Hatoba dispute with the Plaintiff from the Pakistan on March 8, 2008, while Hatoba and Hato B met C, it is thought that C’s family members died with B.