1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 8, 2011, the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act was amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274 on November 1, 201, as the Plaintiff was a foreigner of the nationality of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (hereinafter “Seoul”), and the said short-term commercial status (C-2) sojourn status was deleted, and the said short-term commercial status (C-3) sojourn status and the said short-term comprehensive commercial status (C-3) sojourn status were integrated into the said short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status.

On January 31, 2012, six days before the expiration of the period of stay, after entering the Republic of Korea as the status of stay, filed an application for refugee recognition to the defendant.

(hereinafter “instant refugee application”). B.

On May 27, 2013, the defendant rejected the refugee application of this case on the ground that the plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff would suffer persecution" as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

(See Evidence No. 1-1, hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”).

On June 24, 2013, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the instant disposition to the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed it on April 11, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is the kind of sludge from the mid-to long-term Mata Data District. The plaintiff's assertion is the medium-to long-term data.

On November 3, 201, 201, the Plaintiff received a intimidation call that “I would die unless I give 500,000 watch to the Plaintiff,” from a person without his/her name, and received the said intimidation call several times thereafter.

In addition, on March 18, 201, the Plaintiff is not more than B party in the election of a member of the Council (Urban Council) that was conducted in the territory of the Republic of Korea (Polonna) in the territory of the Republic of Korea (Polna) china (Lanura).