logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.07.29 2015고정776
업무방해
Text

Defendant

A A Fines 2,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 1,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 1,000,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was the chief of the original department, Defendant B, and C of the “I Hospital” in Daegu-gu, where the victim E jointly operates with F, G, and the victim E, who is engaged in the duties of receiving medical treatment as a staff member of the said hospital, and the victim was dissatisfied with the introduction of the PACS system, which is the F, G, and computerized video system, and the settlement terms of the business relationship, and conspired to reject the victim’s receipt of the patient’s request for medical treatment.

1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and C;

A. On April 12, 2013, the Defendants: (a) filed to the patient J who applied for the receipt of treatment with the victim at the above hospital; (b) the fact that the victimized person provided treatment at the above hospital No. 2; (c) however, the injured person provided treatment at the above hospital No. 2; and (d) rejected the receipt of treatment and interfered with the victim’s duties by fraudulent means.

B. On April 12, 2013, the Defendants: (a) filed an application with K for medical treatment with the victim; and (b) filed an application with the victim for medical treatment at the hospital No. 2; (c) provided medical treatment with the victim at the hospital No. 2; and (d) rejected the receipt of medical treatment and interfere with the victim’s duties by fraudulent means.

(c)

On April 12, 2013, the Defendants: (a) filed an application with the victim to receive medical treatment at the above hospital; (b) filed an application with the victim for medical treatment at the hospital No. 2; and (c) the victim provided medical treatment at the hospital No. 2; and (d) rejected the receipt of medical treatment and interfered with the victim’s duties by deceptive means.

(d)

On August 28, 2013, the Defendants: (a) to the patient M who applied for the receipt of treatment to the victim at the above hospital; (b) to the effect that the victimized person provided treatment at the above hospital No. 2; and (c) to the effect that “the head of the E Institute shall not provide treatment;” and (d) to refuse the receipt of treatment.

arrow