logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.07.11 2017고단2390
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a business owner of a sexual traffic business establishment, which is located on the first basement B, in the period of harmony.

The defendant from February 24, 2017 to the same year.

3. From around 20 to the above place, six rooms in the room, one room in the atmosphere, six smugglings, CCTVs, etc. were installed and 10,000 won were found from the sex purchase left, and sexual traffic has been arranged for sexual traffic by causing female sexual traffic DNA, etc. to stimulate sexual intercourse into the hands.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Monthly rent contract for commercial buildings;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is true that the act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a crime requiring strict punishment because of the considerable social harm, such as the commercialization of sex and harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals, etc. However, considering the favorable circumstances in which the defendant misleads and reflects his/her wrongness, and there is an open son to support the crime of this case, and considering the favorable circumstances in which the defendant must support the crime of this case, the punishment like the order shall be imposed after comprehensively taking into account all the factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, such as the period of business, size of business, type of business, number of female workers engaged in sexual traffic, and gains from arranging sexual traffic.

arrow