A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a “CMagro” on the 3th floor and 7th floor of the Magro B building in Permitted-si.

From June 2, 2016 to February 16, 2017, the Defendant’s above seven floors, and the same year.

2. From around 17 to February 20, 2017, from now on the third floor, a person was equipped with smuggling, kitchen, camera, CCTV, etc., and 1.20,000 won from the south of sex purchase found therein, and arranged commercial sex acts by having sexual intercourse with sexual traffic female D, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. A real estate lease agreement and invoice;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing)

1. The scope of the recommended punishment in accordance with the sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court [type]; the basic area [the scope of the recommended punishment] shall be six months to one year and four months; and

2. It is true that the act of arranging sexual traffic is a crime that has considerable social harm, such as the commercialization of sex and harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals, and thus requires strict punishment. However, the defendant's wrong recognition and reflects the defendant's act, the defendant's closure of the business of this case and faithfully lives in the workplace, the defendant's act of living in the workplace with no criminal history is considered in favor of the first offender who has no criminal history, and all other sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, such as the period of business, size of business, type of business, number of employees engaged in sexual traffic, and profits generated from the act of arranging sexual traffic, shall be sentenced to the same punishment as the order within the scope of the recommended punishment.