beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 6,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A, as the director of C in-house and the auditor of C in-house, and the representative director of C in-house filed a fraudulent complaint against D in-house, A had the intent to forge and submit a labor contract under the name of C representative director in order to file a complaint with D in-house branch office of the Korea Labor Agency of Middle-gu Seoul in order to correct the delayed payment of wages.
1. From the end of January 2017 to the beginning of June 2017, Defendant B, who forged private documents, was employed as an employee of the “A(A) Co., Ltd.” in the form of the “annual salary work contract (regular workers)” in which Defendant B received instructions from Defendant A and received from Defendant A to the Internet through the dward process by using a computer, and entered into an employment contract in accordance with the Labor Standards Act as follows.
The phrase “business operator number: E: Business operator number: E: Business operator number: business operator G head of the Yeongdeungpo-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and business operator: (a) the business operator: (b) written and printed out “C” and attached the seal of the representative director of C, the corporation under the custody of C, the left-hand, on the third left-hand, while preparing items, such as the term of contract, type of work and duties, working hours, wages, holidays and vacations; and (c) “business operator” column.
As a result, the Defendants forged one of the annual salary work contracts (regular) in the name of the C representative Director Co., Ltd., a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering in collusion.
2. On June 2017, Defendant A’s event of the above investigation document submitted a forged annual salary work contract at the public service offices of the branch office of the Korea Labor Agency branch office of the Korea Labor Agency of the Daejeon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which had been a 2166 (Ycheon-dong), to the relevant employee who is aware of the forgery, and exercised it.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each of the Defendants’ respective legal statements were led to confessions on the first trial date, but they were made once on the second trial date and “D is authorized.”