1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) if the court of the first instance stated on the ground of "not only passive amount of damages", "not less than 3)", "limit of liability", and "the scope of the exercise of the Plaintiff's right to indemnity" as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, the part used in the second instance court's determination on the recognition of negative amount of damages and the content of appraisal (i) gender: (b) date of birth of female: (iii) date of birth: (iv) March 23, 201; (iv) 2.5 percent of total amount of wages and monthly income (i.e., date of birth of 2.5 percent from March 24, 2016 to 2.5 percent of total amount of urban daily wages: 94,338 won (from July 24, 2016 to 2.6.5 percent of total amount of wages of 1.6% from 25%, 2016 to 3.6.81.6.28

B) 12,812,140 won as listed in the table below. 12,812,140 won shall be 12,82,140 won as listed in the table below. 2016-7-724 2016-8-314, 33822, 436 2.50% of the daily income of 12016-724 2016-724, 2016-9-12019, 2016-129, 2016-129, 2016-12019, 82222, 197, 197, 605-25, 207, 205, 205, 375, 206-15, 275, 274, 257, 2015

C. According to Article 45 of the Restrictions on Liability, if a beneficiary receives a mutual aid benefit under this Act, the State, local governments, and local governments are liable for compensating for, or compensating for, damage caused by a school safety accident.