A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a report from a police officer, who was dispatched to the police officer, C, or Posman, who was asked him of the instant situation from the police officer, who was called up with a taxi driver and a trial guard, at the end of the Seocheon-si Cultural Center at the end of 113:00,00, in front of the shooting distance of the Gocheon Culture Center; (b) on July 13, 2018, the Defendant took a bath for the instant situation, such as “C and Posp. Ra.........., the police officers, who continued to be arranged, took the said road patrol for the patrol duty, and continue to go through the said road while crossing the taxi without permission from the opposite part of the police station around the passage of the said place, thereby preventing the police officers from going to the front patrol and continuing the patrol by going to the front of the patrol.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the maintenance of public order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A copy of the work log;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (referring to a police officer who attempts to take one police officer, and immediately prevents police officers from performing their official duties in a manner that prevents police officers from getting on board the police officer) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is against the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case, the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the method and degree of exercising force, the defendant's attitude after being arrested as the current offender was not good, and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, sexual conduct, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., which are the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of