logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.04.28 2015고정2683
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Suwon District Court’s Pyeongtaek District on the grounds of a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 21, 2015.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

On March 12, 2015, around 15:05, the Defendant driven a chip car not covered by mandatory insurance in the new city located in the Nowon-gu Nowon-gu, Daegu, Nowon-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A criminal investigation report (attaching photographs of damaged vehicles);

1. Inquiry into history of a medical insurance contract;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of investigation reports (Attachment to the judgment of the first instance court, etc.);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Damages of Motor Vehicles that choose a penalty, and selection of a fine;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person driving Branchising a passenger car.

On March 12, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on March 15, 2015, and proceeded in the new road in the Nowon-gu Nowon-gu, Daegu, Nowon-gu, as it was in the direction of selling it on the side of the horizontal intersection (insular road entrance), and changed the course from the first lane to the second lane.

In this case, there was a duty of care to inform the direction of the change in advance and to change the lanes safely by keeping the traffic situation of the right and the right and the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to change the lane as it is and conflicted with the part of the victim C(38) driver's Daren car driving, which was proceeding on the right-hand side of the same direction, into the front part of the above vehicle.

After all, the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle by the above negligence, which is equivalent to 370,000 won.

2. The above facts charged are determined.

arrow