logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.05.10 2015고단1004
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No owner of a motor vehicle violating the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, on October 2014, the Defendant owned Crando motor vehicle and operated the said motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance at approximately 50 km from the front road of the Defendant’s house located in Seojin-gu, Jeondong-gu, Seoul to April 5, 2015.

2. The accused is a person who is engaged in driving a franchise-low vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the violation of the Road Traffic Act;

On April 5, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.14% during blood transfusion at around 00:13, while driving the said car, and proceeded with the front unit of the apartment apartment apartment unit in Seongdong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City as the front unit of the apartment unit in the Jeon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, along the two-lanes at the speed of about 60km between the front section and the front section of the river basin in the front section.

At the time, there was a duty of care to reduce speed and drive safely by checking the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, failed to discover G Doz taxi operated by the victim F (55 years old) who was driven by the victim F (55 years old) without being negligent in performing the above duty of care and tried to change the lane from the two lanes to the one lane, received the part from the back on the right side of the said Dozzy taxi to the front line of the right side of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim due to the above occupational negligence during approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, even though he damages HG taxi owned by the above F to repair cost 1,119,776 won (including added tax), he immediately stops and stops the victim.

arrow