logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2012.09.25 2012고단2431
부정수표단속법위반
Text

1. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, Defendant A and C by a fine of three million won.

2. Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Defendant A and B conspired with Defendant A, who received a stock company run by AF in around 2008, issued a check by borrowing the name from Defendant A, who had no employee at the time of the registration of the representative director was impossible due to the bad credit standing relationship, and paid 30% of the profit in return.

Therefore, from August 2, 2010, Defendant B entered into a check contract in the name of the Busan Bank's head and the above company from around August 2, 201 and entered into a check contract in the name of the company.

Defendant

B issued one check number "H", "5,00,000 won", and one copy of the check number per bank under the name of C Co., Ltd. (Defendant A of the representative director) in the name of August 15, 201, which became the date of issuance "C" in the office of C in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do, the check amount of which was "H", and the check amount was paid to the above bank on August 16, 201, which was within the period of presentment for payment, but was not paid as a disposition of suspension of transaction. In addition, from around that time to July 20, 2011, the check amount was issued six copies of the check amount of total three times in total, including the check amount of KRW 21,30,000,000, and the check amount was paid as a disposition of suspension of transaction.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to issue three copies of the number of units per unit, but did not receive the suspension of transaction.

[Judgment of the court below]

2. At the time and place set forth in paragraph (1), the Defendant Co., Ltd. issued three copies of the per share swap as above, which are the representative director A and the Defendant and the Defendant’s actual operator and the person who prepared the per share swap, but did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each accusation (No. 1, 4, and 6 evidence submitted by the prosecutor);

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 3 (1) and 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act;

1. Defendant B: Defendant A and Defendant C who choose to imprisonment with prison labor; 1. Selection of fines;

arrow