logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원서부지원 2020.11.26 2020고단231
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below]

1. On May 13, 2019, the criminal defendant against the victim B made use of Kakakao Stockholm to the victim B, “in the name of another person, he/she shall transfer his/her mobile phone apparatus to another person.” The criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement that he/she would give his/her mobile phone value if he/she transferred his/her mobile phone value to B by opening one galthal jus of S105G mobile phone apparatus at the E mobile communications store.”

However, even if the defendant received the cell phone from the victim and used it, he did not intend to pay the cell phone price and the communication fee.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received a cell phone device from F to G from the victim, and revised it ex officio according to facts obtained through the examination of evidence without any changes in the indictment, to the extent that the Defendant did not disadvantage the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense, including the sum of KRW 1,457,50, and the communications fee of KRW 3,881,940 from June to September of that year.

by allowing the victim to pay the same amount on behalf of the victim without paying the same amount of property benefits.

2. The Defendant, after receiving a mobile phone device from B as above, talked with B and the previous Kakakakakao Amera, and had been in custody of B’s driver’s license pictures and corporate bank bank account number (H) in the form of deception with B, with the intention to open the cell phone device additionally in his name without the consent of B, and sell it as a medium cell phone.

Around May 23, 2019, the Defendant had access to the homepage of E, a victimized company using a computer, to the homepage of E, a mobile phone (I), entered B’s name, date of birth, contact information, address, etc. into the “J new contract” form, and applied for such a small entry.

arrow