logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.06.27 2015나2643
사정재판에 대한 이의의 소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: the part concerning "former Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage Guarantee Act (wholly amended by Act No. 9740 of May 27, 2009; hereinafter referred to as the "former Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage Guarantee Act") No. 16 "I; 1,86,460 won for 1,70 won for 16th 17th 19; 20th 5th 7th 7th 17th 17th 17th 17th 207 2th 5th 207, 206th 5th 200 7th 17th 207 5th 17th 207 5th 17th 207 5th 206th 207 5th 200 7th 17th 207).

[Supplementary Part] [Attachment 18] and Plaintiff International Fund asserts that even if the damage of Defendant (limited creditor) can be recognized, the period of damage should be limited to the extent of one month necessary for the re-employment in another place.

[Attachment 2] (4) The scope of damage of the accident of this case includes the area where the accident of this case was born.

arrow