logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.04.27 2019고단5048
업무상횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From July 2013 to October 2018, the Defendant served as a member of the “D” retail business operated by both countries C from July 2013 to October 2018, and supplied food, etc. sold by the said business to customers, such as marina, and charged with the business of collecting the price.

1. Around January 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received two stuffs equivalent to KRW 100,000 at the market price from the victim C; (b) sold the 90,000 won to G operating a “F cafeteria” located in the French city E (hereinafter referred to as “F cafeteria”); and (c) embezzled the said 2 stuff in a manner that arbitrarily uses the said money for the Defendant’s living expenses; and (d) thereafter, embezzled the said 2 stuff by not later than May 17, 2018, by means of the same three times in total as indicated in the attached list of crimes, the Defendant embezzled the 50,000 won in total at the market price of the 250,000 won in the non-so-so-so-so-so-called Ba, which was owned by the victim

2. On September 2018, the Defendant changed his private document: (a) heard from a staff member under the jurisdiction of the court of Justice on his or her name, that “(ju) does not fit the amount recorded in the current balance of the written confirmation of attempted transactions indicating the balance of the goods unpaid to D; (b) would not pay the goods if the balance is changed; and (c) had the intent to arbitrarily compile the written confirmation of attempted transactions and submit it to the court of Justice in order to conceal the fact that the amount of the written confirmation of attempted transactions is inconsistent with the actual amount of the proceeds of the transaction, on the grounds of an influence.”

Accordingly, around September 10, 2018, the Defendant entered and printed a discretionary number using a computer at the office of the Defendant at Dongducheon-si, K Apartment L, and then sold from the Defendant on September 7, 2018, “8,309,247 “B” of “4,709,639,” and “B” of “B” of the balance prior to the sale as of August 1, 2018, as of August 2, 2018.

arrow