Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for six months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On November 12, 2017, at around 03:18, the Defendants discovered 2 math by 105,000 won at the market price, which is the victim's possession of the water satisfaction center, and reported the gap in the surrounding supervision to the other Defendant B, and Defendant A divided 1 math by 1 math after breaking up to sunrise.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of receipts, such as each photograph, tea, AVNI data, etc.

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reduction of a small amount under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. Defendant A: The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the type] [the reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act] - Type 2 (the person who is subject to special sentencing] [the person who is subject to the sentencing] - [the decision in the sphere of recommendation] mitigation area (the decision in the sphere of recommendation] mitigation area (Defendant B), basic area (Defendant A] (the scope of recommendation), April to 10 (the scope of recommendation), June to 6 to 1 year (Defendant B), and June to 6 (Defendant A)] where two or more aggravated factors are combined [the person subject to general sentencing] - The main reason for the suspension of execution is not positive punishment (whether or not there are two or more aggravated factors] - there is no criminal conviction or more for the suspension of positive damage (the decision of sentence], together with the above sentencing factors, the history of punishment by Defendant and the attitude of reflect nature of punishment by each defendant.