Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 19, 2015, around 14:47, at the event site of the EGF floor “F” operated by the victim D in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendants looked at the surrounding area; Defendant A, and Defendant B, as if he purchased one rapid stoper equivalent to KRW 149,000, the market price on the display site of the above event site, followed up the gap in which supervision over the surrounding area was neglected.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes that attach CCTV images to a photograph;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 331(2) and 331(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B to suspend sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months;

1. Defendant B of suspended sentence: Reasons for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines for Defendant A;

(a) The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for six months to five years; and

(b) Scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the type of determination] scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of the punishment [the area of recommendation and the scope of the punishment], the area of mitigation of the punishment [the scope of the punishment and the scope of the recommendation], six months from June to October (the lowest limit of the sentencing guidelines is lower than the statutory minimum limit of the sentencing guidelines, and thus the statutory minimum limit of the sentencing guidelines is lower)] mitigated factors: The serious reflective and aggravated factors: two or more combined cases;

(c) A positive reason for probation [main reason for probation]: A positive reason for non-prosecution of punishment (general reason): insignificant damage, absence of a criminal record of a stay of execution or more, and obvious social relationship between the defendant and his/her family members clearly involve excessive difficulty for his/her family members.

2. The instant crime committed on the grounds of the decision of the sentence against Defendant A and the suspension of sentence against Defendant B was committed on the grounds of this case. The Defendants, both of whom are the married couple, may set one occupant at the department store in order to give them to the