logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.09.23 2015고단3067
출입국관리법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Status of the Defendant] Defendant C, Defendant A, and Defendant B are foreigners of the Republic of Korea, who are foreigners of the Republic of Korea who moved a fiber factory, etc. from Gyeonggi-do North Korea and work as parks.

【Criminal Facts】 The Defendants, despite having been aware that they had been employed in the Republic of Korea and had been able to obtain a visa (VSA) by pretending that they were invited for business purposes and enter the Republic of Korea to engage in job-seeking activities.

1. For the above purpose, Defendant C submitted a false letter of invitation and a false letter of visa issuance to the effect that “Iel License Co., Ltd., Ltd., a textile company of the Republic of Korea, is scheduled to enter the Republic of Korea,” to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea, which was located on September 26, 2012, when one of the F, who acquired the Korean nationality by marriage with the Korean woman, sought a false letter of invitation from the domestic company and sent it to the Defendant, Defendant C, with the false letter of invitation to the effect that “Iel License and business will be scheduled,” and the document of visa issuance, as if the document of visa application was duly prepared, shall be submitted to the public official under the name of the Buddhist public official in charge of visa issuance, who shall be subject to the above public official’s short-term (C34) visa, and entered the Republic of Korea through the Incheon Airport on November 24, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with E and F in sequence, thereby hindering legitimate execution of duties concerning visa issuance duties of public officials in charge of visa issuance duties belonging to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea, which belongs to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea, by deceptive means, and filing a false application for visa.

2. For the above purpose, if the Defendant sought a false invitation letter from a domestic company and sent it to the Defendant, the Defendant applied for the issuance of a visa for the purpose of business with a false invitation letter.

arrow