Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Seoul Central District Court on September 4, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 4, 2015.
Telecommunications finance fraud is a “management (general responsibility)” under overall management or instruction, such as delivery of access media (one-person passbook), withdrawal of damage amount, remittance of withdrawn amount, etc., which is intended to use for a crime through international telephone or mobile communications in Korea or in China, and the role of inviting a large number of unspecified people to use for a crime by freely phoneing to a large number of unspecified people, “book for solicitation of one-to-face passbook”; a role of delivering a solicited one cash withdrawal book to a government agency (the National Police Agency, the Prosecutor’s Office, the Financial Supervisory Service, etc.); a person misrepresenting a lending company to a large number of unspecified people in need of pay money; and a role of demanding money by calling for money from a large number of unspecified people who need to pay money to a large number of unspecified people, including China’s “on-site telecomter”, and the management book (total liability) that takes full charge of withdrawing from the bank, etc., to transfer the amount of money to another financial organization or to transfer the amount of money to an account by means of money transfer.”
On May 2015, according to the proposal of the “C,” which became known through the Internet job-seeking site, the Defendant was recruited to take charge of the role of the “passing” and “direct remittance” and “passing”, by taking over the passbook or card under another person’s name, and withdrawing and remitting cash using it, and acquiring 4% of the amount of the withdrawal in return.
On July 15, 2015, 17:30 on July 15, 2015, an employee in charge of telephone financing fraud will misrepresent the victim D with a telephone call to make a low interest rate substitute loan by misrepresenting the modern capital staff.
In a false manner, the E-mail bank shall be from the injured party.