logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.01.19 2016고단491
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. A. On February 20, 2014, the Defendant against the victim C would have opened and completed a road up to December 30, 2014 to ensure that the victim purchases 200 square meters of the D land from Ansan-si D (hereinafter “D”) so that it can construct a house for electric power supply, and install a water and sewage system up to the boundary of the land so that tap water can be potable.

"A false statement was made with a victim to enter into a land trade contract."

However, at the time of the purchase of the above land, there was no urban water supply system, and the Defendant did not have obtained the development permission for the construction of the above land, and there was no plan for the construction of the road or the construction of the urban water supply system. Therefore, even if the injured party purchased the above land, there was no intention or ability to open the road and pack the road, or

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and obtained the delivery of KRW 73,80,000 as the purchase price of forest land from the victim on the same day.

B. On February 26, 2014, the Defendant against the victim E intends to build a road up to December 30, 2014, which opened and completes a package until December 30, 2014 to enable the purchase of 200 square meters from D land to construct a house for electric source of the pertinent land, and install a water and sewage system up to the boundary of the land so that tap water can be potable.

"A false statement was made with a victim to enter into a land trade contract."

However, at the time of the purchase of the above land, there was no urban water supply system, and the Defendant did not have obtained the development permission for the construction of the above land, and there was no plan for the construction of the road or the construction of the urban water supply system. Therefore, even if the injured party purchased the above land, there was no intention or ability to open the road and pack the road, or

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is the purchase price of land from the victim.

arrow