logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.06 2016나7037
통행료 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 13, 1965, the Plaintiff registered the transfer of ownership on the ground of sale on October 8, 1957 with respect to the land of this case 1,69 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). Under the following, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale on October 8, 1957, with respect to the indication of real estate related to the instant case, excluding the remaining lot numbers, which are common with respect to the indication of real estate.

B. Some of the instant land has been used as a farming road for the entry of neighboring farmland in the form of a farm prior to the Plaintiff’s acquisition of ownership. In around 1981, as part of the Saemaul Project, land owners nearby the instant land were scarcityd, and the existing farming road was expanded as a part of the Saemaul Project around 1981.

(hereinafter referred to as the “road prior to the packaging of the instant case”) C.

On the other hand, the Korea Electric Power Corporation used the road prior to the packaging of the instant case on the access of construction vehicles for the construction of power transmission tracks around 2004. At the time, Hri residents demanded the said road to be destroyed due to the said construction vehicle’s access to the said construction vehicle and to pack the said road.

The Korea Electric Power Corporation has contained the said road in concrete around that time after consultation with Hri residents.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant packaging road”) d.

In the package of this case, land owned by the plaintiff is included in the annexed drawings No. 2, (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (1), (1), (1), (5), (1), and (1), and (36 square meters inboard (B), which are connected in sequence to each point, (36 square meters (hereinafter referred

E. The Defendants are the landowners nearby the instant land, and Defendant B is the owner of the neighboring land, and Defendant C is the multi-family house on June 18, 2007 and the second floor on J ground; Defendant C is the owner of the K on December 8, 2008; Defendant C is the owner of the second floor on L’s second floor detached house and the single-story warehouse on December 19, 2008; Defendant D is the owner of the single-story animal and plant related facilities on M on December 19, 2008; Defendant E is the second floor on the ground and the single-story warehouse on June 30, 2009.

arrow