beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for six months, each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won.
Defendant
B and C shall be subject to the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A on June 9, 2015, at the Daegu District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment to be a crime of fraud, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 15, 2016.
1. Defendant A’s perjury;
A. On May 21, 2015, the Defendant gave testimony to B in the vicinity of the Daegu District Court building located in the Daegu Suwon-gu building located in the Dong on May 21, 2015, where “I would like to give testimony when I would know that I would return to G because I would be an employee under the F, I would like to give that testimony.
The request was made by “B”, and the B accepted it.
Accordingly, in the court of 302 located in the Daegu Suwon-gu District Court in around 14:00 on the same day, B appeared as a witness of the fraud case against the defendant (A) at the above court of 2014 Godan 5460 on the same day, and taken an oath against the defendant (A) at the above court of Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 14:00 on the same day, and the presiding judge at the above court of first instance 2 part of the above court in the trial of the above case "It is not possible to know whether it is well aware of the sale in lots and property status of the G, and A was unaware of
“The testimony was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, in fact, as the defendant was in overall control of the company's business according to the direction of F, the representative of G as the employee of G, and the defendant was engaged in the overall sale of apartment buildings and the fund management in relation to G's apartment sales agency business, it was known that the defendant was well aware of the situation of G's sales and property at the time, and the defendant attended the place where H's investment notes are prepared and affixed a seal to read each letter in a timely manner, so he was aware of the investment conditions, and even if he was aware of that fact, he made a false statement contrary to his memory.
Accordingly, the defendant had B make a false statement contrary to his memory and abetted B to give perjury.
B. The defendant is the date and time set forth in the above paragraph (a) and place C.