logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.24 2017나56713
대여금
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff succeeding intervenor's claim is dismissed.

3. The total cost of the lawsuit.

Reasons

According to the purport of the application for intervention and the purport of the oral argument, the cause of the instant claim appears to have sought payment of KRW 5,853,562, which is the sum of the principal and interest of KRW 2,587,558, and KRW 5,853,562 from the Defendant on the ground that the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff acquired the right of loans against the Defendant of the National Bank of Korea on the ground that the Plaintiff acquired the right of loans prior to the transfer. However, there is no assertion or proof to specify the claim, such as the date of occurrence, amount

Thus, the claim in this case is not specified as the cause of the claim, and even if it is not so, the claim in this case is recognized as extinguished by the completion of prescription.

The claim of the plaintiff succeeding intervenor shall be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance that accepted the plaintiff's claim is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow