1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The plaintiff succeeding intervenor's claims against the defendants are all satisfied.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the instant case is to be rejected by K’s witness of the party which is insufficient to recognize the Plaintiff’s assertion, and except for the addition of “the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor acquired the Plaintiff’s claim for the instant claim against the Defendants from the Plaintiff around February 2018,” as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of “around February 2018, the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor acquired the Plaintiff’s claim for the instant claim from the Plaintiff.” As such, it is to

2. Thus, the claim of this case that the plaintiff succeeding intervenor succeeded in the court of the first instance shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and since the plaintiff succeeding intervenor participates in the lawsuit and the plaintiff withdraws from the lawsuit, the judgment of the court of first instance shall be modified as stated in the Disposition.