A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The so-called telephone financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as “scam”) is a financial fraud that assumes a false name of a State agency or financial institution and transfers money to a secured bank account (hereinafter referred to as “scam”), withdraws the amount of damage and transfers it to another bank account, or transfers it to the Chinese or Korean accomplices through money exchange stations, etc.

They are ① China’s total books (the organizational management of China and Korea, the call center operation, the instructions for solicitation and delivery of passbooks, cash withdrawal and remittance), ② Korea’s total books (the management and education of lighting staff in Korea, remittance, and instructions for solicitation and delivery of passbooks in China under Chinese’s overall books), ③ remittance books (the delivery to Chinese remittance or money exchangeer), ④ withdrawal books (the withdrawal of money deposited in the passbook), ⑤ (the delivery of money deposited in the passbook), ⑤ solicitation and delivery books of passbooks (the delivery of passbooks to be used for criminal conduct through solicitation, goods storage, or Kwikset Service). They are crimes in which each role can be completed.

Around July 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported text messages to the Defendant’s mobile phone to return money to the person designated by the B team leader in contact with the Defendant’s name in the name of the singishing organization (hereinafter “B team leader”); (b) transferred the passbook under the name of the Defendant and received suspension of indictment for the purpose of receiving a loan even around 201; (c) transferred the passbook under the name of the Defendant to the name in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of receiving the loan; and (d) the Defendant was subject to suspension of indictment at the Seoul East East District Prosecutors’ Office.

The money did not doubt that it was a source of damage to the crime of Bophishing fraud, but did not want to play a role of withdrawal for the purpose of receiving a loan.

The name and non-name of the organization of Bosing.