Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인들은 공동하여 2012. 10. 24. 20:30경 서울 도봉구 E아파트 관리동 2층 회의실에서 열린 정기총회에 참석한 피해자 F에게 피고인 A가 “회의를 방청하려면 3일 전에 방청신청을 하여야 하는데, 1일 전에 신청하였기에 아파트 관리규약상 방청을 허락할 수 없으니 퇴장해 달라.”고 요구하였는데, 피해자가 “뭘 사기 치려고 그러느냐 ”며 거절하자, 피고인 B은 “나가라”고 말하며 출입문 쪽으로 피해자를 밀쳐 피해자와 같이 회의실 밖 복도로 나갔다.

Defendant

A In the outer corridor of the conference room, “this brobball bru,” and the brush of the victim’s flab by hand, Defendant C was tightly pushed down with the flab by hand, and Defendant C was tightly pushed down with the flab by hand, and Defendant B was flabed with the flab by the flab, “this brobb brut bru,” and the flabed part of the right side by the b and 3-time walked part of the flab, which requires treatment for about 14 days, and caused the victim’s injury, such as the flab of the flab and tension.

2. In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, in particular the witness G and H’s respective legal statements, and the video images of CCTV recording materials (No. 2 & 66 pages of investigation records), the sole evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone used by the Defendants to assault the victim as stated in the facts charged.

It is insufficient to recognize the fact that the victim or the victim sustained the same injury as the stated in the facts charged due to the assault by the Defendants, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, each of the Defendants is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced under Article 58(2)