logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.10.16 2015나3866
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “The date of the pronouncement of the judgment in this case was pronounced in the first instance court” of the third 19 of the judgment in the first instance court; “The prosecution in this case was pending in the appellate court (Seoul District Court 2014No2980)” was pronounced in the judgment of innocence; “The prosecution filed an appeal with the Gwangju District Court 2014No2980, Jul. 16, 2015; “The date of the pronouncement of the judgment in this case was finalized” of the third 7th 3th 7th 3th 7th 7th 3th 7th 7th 7th 7th 2012, “The Act on Promotion, etc. of Litigation” was described in the main sentence of the Civil Procedure Act and the main sentence of Article 20th 40 of the judgment in the first 20th 4th 7th 7th 7th 2015.

2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's preliminary principal lawsuit and the defendant's counterclaim are justified within the above scope of recognition, and the plaintiff's main lawsuit and the remainder of the main lawsuit, and the defendant's remainder of the main lawsuit are dismissed without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified as it is with merit, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow