1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants, as a husband and wife, supplied the Plaintiff, who runs the wholesale and retail business of sports supplies from around December 10, 201 to March 30, 201, with the 19,605,670 won as “D” in the form of “D” (hereinafter “instant goods”).

B. Defendant B filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking the payment payable of the instant goods by Seoul Central District Court Decision 2013Gaso751938, and subsequently accepted the claim of Defendant B on November 22, 2013. The Plaintiff appealed as Seoul Central District Court Decision 201365702, but the appeal was dismissed on December 10, 2014. While the Plaintiff filed a second appeal, the final appeal was dismissed on April 24, 2015, and the final judgment became final and conclusive.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Eul's entry of evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendants suffered damages of the total amount of KRW 27,945,852 (i.e., KRW 6., KRW 11,369,730, KRW 11,369, KRW 730, KRW 39,00) as follows, due to delay in supplying the goods of this case without complying with the agreed payment period, and the defendants are liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages.

① Additional expense of KRW 6.9 million: due to the delay in the supply by the Defendants, the Plaintiff was bound to make a shipment at one time and divide it. During that process, 4.6 million won in the case of the 13,370 capts (hereinafter referred to as “explosion” refers to the unit of clothes) ordered on December 15, 201, and 2.3 million won in the case of the 14,717 caps ordered on November 15, 2012.

② Inventory 11,369,730 won for inventory storage: