beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fine of 200,000 won, Defendant D’s fine of 300,000 won, Defendant B’s fine of 200,000 won, and Defendant B’s.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 20, 2013, Defendant A was faced with a traffic accident involving a vehicle driven by Defendant A, on the street in front of the “Ghanwon” located in Ora-si F, Ora-si, Ora-si on the street, and the other vehicle driven by Defendant A while being accompanied by a vehicle driven by C while getting along and going to a destination.
In such a case, although the Defendant knew that he would be able to receive more traffic accident agreements and long-term and life insurance money from the insurance company to be hospitalized in a hospital, he/she received minor damage by exaggerationing it, he/she has attempted to deceiving the insurance company as if he actually received hospitalized treatment
On April 29, 2013, the Defendant claimed insurance premium from the I Council located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, for seven days from April 23, 2013 to April 29, 2013, as the Defendant received hospitalized treatment.
However, although the Defendant received approximately nine times of hospitalization (excluding discharge days), he/she received only 40,00 medical treatment, and he/she was discharged first, 1-2 out of prisons during his/her personal usage period, and 3-day during his/her seven-day hospitalization period, and did not properly receive hospitalization, such as being locked in his/her residence and living.
The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim from the Korea Commercial Damage Insurance Co., Ltd. on April 29, 2013, the charged facts of KRW 1,376,710 as the name of the agreed amount and treatment expenses are “1,374,230 won,” but it appears that it is erroneous.
It refers to 143 pages, etc. of investigation records, and acquired them by fraud.
2. Defendant D around June 3, 2013, around 19:00, at the street in front of the “K” located in the Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, Defendant D suffered a traffic accident where a driver of the other vehicle, on board the Otoba and the other vehicle, faces a collision with the vehicle door of the Abama.
In such cases, the defendant is aware that he/she may receive more traffic accident agreements and long-term and life insurance from an insurance company to be hospitalized in a hospital.