logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.12.12 2018고단931
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 931]

1. Larceny;

A. On July 17, 2018, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of one smartphone, one cash, 150,000 won in the market price, and one credit card line; (b) on August 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the victim G located in Sacheon-si F, through through through (c) the victim E engaged in showering in a bath room; and (b) at the victim’s house located in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, the victim’s share of KRW 90,00,000 in the victim’s share, and caused the victim’s share of KRW 120,00 in the market price; and (c) the victim’s share of KRW 250,00 in the victim’s share of the shock at his/her bathing room; and (d) the victim’s share of KRW 250,00 in the Plaintiff’s share of financial business.

A. On July 17, 2018, the Defendant presented a credit card under the name of stolen and stolen E as if the Defendant owned the Defendant, such as the “A” in paragraph (1) of this Article, to the victim’s name, who was the taxi engineer, at around 23:30, 135, 135, 201. On July 17, 2018, the Defendant made a proposal for “one-time tin of a card” in cash instead of paying less than the actual fees. The Defendant paid a sum of KRW 80,000 and KRW 380,000,000, including the taxi rate of KRW 80,000, in cash to be used by the Defendant from the DNA telecom referred to in “A”, and the Defendant received considerable pecuniary benefits from the victim and KRW 300,000,000, in cash, from the victim, and used the stolen credit card.

B. On August 3, 2018, at around 21:50, the Defendant presented to the victim’s name Buddhist passenger, who was the taxi engineer, the victim’s name and Buddhist passenger, as stated in the first “B” as if the Defendant owned the Defendant, as in the first “B,” a single statement of “one-time-time-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-case-based-based-based-based-based-case-based-based-based-case-based-based-based-case-based-based-based-case-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based

arrow