beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 52,800,000 as well as annual 5% from July 25, 2013 to September 25, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff’s status and the conclusion of a cargo storage contract are companies engaged in logistics agency business and transportation business. 2) The Plaintiff, since before 2007, has entered into a contract with the Korea Unmpif Elevator Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Unmpic”), entered into a contract with the Korea Unmpic (hereinafter “Korea Unmpic”), and has been in charge of cargo transportation at the Korea Unmpic.
In around 2007, the Korea Telecommunication International Logistics Co., Ltd. was a party to the above contract, but the Korea Telecommunication International Logistics Co., Ltd. was merged with the Korea Telecommunication Co., Ltd. around September 2008, and the Korea Telecommunication Co., Ltd changed its trade name to the Korea Telecommunication Co., Ltd. (Plaintiff) around 2012.
The term “Plaintiff” is only referred to as “Plaintiff” without distinction.
3) On September 20, 2007, the Plaintiff is Nonparty B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”).
A) The term of the contract shall be set at two years between the two and two years, and if there is no separate cancellation notice, two years shall be automatically extended. The term “storage” under the storage contract of the Republic of Korea, which means the safe custody of the cargo as a bonded warehouse operator for the cargo of the Republic of Korea, entered into the warehouse of the Plaintiff at the order of the Plaintiff. The term “work” refers to the storage of the cargo of the Republic of Korea, entered into the warehouse of the Republic of Korea, and the term “work” means the classification of the cargo and the recovery/entry of the container, entered into the warehouse, and entered the shipment vehicle (Article 1(2) of the Storage Contract of this case). The contract
B) The Defendant’s status and the current status of the use of the warehouse 1) The Defendant is a company operating logistics agency, transportation business, etc., and on July 1, 2012, the Defendant is a lessee of each warehouse (hereinafter “instant bonded warehouse”) of the annexed warehouse No. B, the lessee of the annexed warehouse No. 4 of the annexed warehouse No. 1 through 3, and each warehouse No. 1 (hereinafter “attached warehouse floor plan”) are omitted.
[2] The sum totaling 760 square meters and 1,450 square meters.