logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.02.06 2012고정116
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person in charge of advertising the newspaper company of the C religious organization reform general meeting, and was a person who held the office as a pastor of the D religious organization.

On August 19, 2011, at around 15:39, the Defendant did not graduate from the new abuse school designated by the general meeting at the second floor C religious organization reform general meeting of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul. At the time of the test for the quasi-public notice, the Defendant did not submit evidentiary materials for viewing the test for public notice as the power of the father of the victim who was the head of the department in charge of the public notice, and carried out the brue with the completion of the brue after passing and receiving the brue. In addition, the Defendant’s “I can see the fact that he received the illegally brue by forginging false academic background and forging it after his father’s forgery of false academic background at the general meeting.” The Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false information by sending text messages to 220 persons in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Evidential materials (the photograph of text messages), written confirmation of the details of receipt, each fact-finding certificate, each data submission statement, each written confirmation, each graduation (H), each grade certificate, each graduation (the I New Abuse), each grade certificate, each grade certificate, each graduation, each grade certificate, each grade certificate, each grade certificate, each grade certificate, and the quasi-public notice certificate, each report by the General Assembly public notice (the list of successful candidates), each report by the 85th general assembly public notice, each wood-related employment advertisement (the report on November 15, 03), representative certificate, each certificate, a translation of the letter of certification, each written answer to questions, and the application of each statute governing each graduation certificate;

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. and Selection of a fine concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow