Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above judgment against the Defendants for two years from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

D is a real estate consulting instructor, Defendant C is an appraiser, Defendant B is an appraiser, Defendant B is an appraisal hub, Defendant A is an interest company of Defendant C’s children.

In fact, even if the Defendants and D received the fees for appraisal and loan brokerage of a building from the victims E, they conducted a normal appraisal or did not have any intent or ability to prepare and issue an appraisal report, they did not notify the victims of such fact in order to acquire money under the pretext of brokerage fees, etc.

Defendants and D pursuant to the above conspiracys:

1. D Around October 2014, in consultation with “G” located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Warman, and with the victim’s consultation on the loan for purchasing I building and the appraisal and assessment of I building located in Ha in the Y in the Jeonsan-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si, the victim may have a loan extended up to 6 billion won if the victim “if the building profitability is too high, and if the property appraisal is conducted through an appraisal and assessment by a private person C.

The appraisal fee, etc. was deposited to assist the loan, and the appraisal fee was changed.

2. On November 24, 2014, Defendant C received the victim’s request for appraisal of a building from D by posting a telephone from the victim.

In the past, 1.5 million won should be deposited and changed since the previous appraisal and assessment precedents should be deleted.

3. From October 17, 2014 to January 29, 2015, Defendant A: (a) managed the money deposited by Defendant C from the damaged party; (b) delivered the said money by using the written appraisal report even if Defendant B is not an appraiser; (c) Defendant B prepared an appraisal report even if it is not an appraiser; and (d) received the said money.

Defendants and D share their respective roles as above, deceiving the victim, and deceiving the victim, the Defendants and D agree with each other as the fees for appraisal and assessment around October 21, 2014.