logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.11.23 2018고단599
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes at the Cheongju District Court on April 16, 2015 and the same year

9. 14. The above judgment was finalized.

[Criminal facts] The defendant is a person who works as a business of the Busan Corporation's Busan Corporation.

On May 2014, the Defendant is entitled to pay at least 60 billion won the appraised value of G in Ansan-si F for the victim D (52 tax) in this E's office operated by Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si.

However, since the appraisal corporation B is not a main appraiser, it is not possible to cause a loan equivalent to the appraised values only by the appraisal evaluation report of the B appraisal corporation. Therefore, the appraisal report of the B appraisal corporation is placed on the computer network of the appraiser, and the third degree of the appraisal appraiser recognized by commercial banks is contacted with the third degree of the appraisal appraiser, and it is possible to receive 50 billion won or more from the main appraiser, and the loan is also identified.

“Along with the false representation, this G’s appraised value was calculated as KRW 75 billion in the name of the BAppraisal Corporation.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have a position to actually appraise or evaluate real estate as a person working for business in the Busan branch office of the B appraisal corporation, and the above simplified appraisal report presented by the Defendant to the victim is not directly evaluate and prepare the said G new business, but voluntarily prepared appraisal report by the Defendant using the computer system of the B appraisal corporation, so there was no intention or ability to receive more than the amount promised even if the Defendant received money from the victim as the fees for appraisal.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.

arrow